On Apr 3, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
First you say:
I don't know where you get the idea that keywords are some kind of
panacea
or are essential to LR operation. They're neither.
in response to my statement
Keywords can be a powerful tool, but they aren't a panacea.
You must not speak the same language I do. But that's neither here nor
there.
Then you say:
Keywords save massive amounts of time later when putting together
groups of
images for sale, exhibits, when locating a particular photo that
some editor
saw your web rez page on, when the family would like all the
pictures of mom
you might have after she's passed away, etc etc etc. That's about
80% of my
image management workflow need and proves a huge time saving.
Which is essentially indicating that Keywords are the basis for your
claims of improved workflow efficiency for LR.
They're not the only thing about LR which improves what I do.
But you don't like LR for your work, won't agree, and will debate in a
literal and assumed naïve fashion every point.
And my Adobe Advocacy check is overdue. Why should I waste any more
of my time on this discussion? ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
