Correct, either you CAN change image DOF via printing or you CANT. Forget the former.
JC O'Connell [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cory Papenfuss Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:58 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Paul Stenquist wrote: > This is a simple issue. Bob is speaking of perceived depth of filed on > a > viewed print. JCO is speaking of critical depth of field in respect to the > ability of a given lens to resolve detail. Both are correct, but each is > discussing an entirely different matter. > > Let it go. ... but as I'm sure we will discover, only one is correct. ;-) -Cory -- ************************************************************************ * * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D. Electrical Engineering, PPSEL-IA * * Research Associate, Vibrations and Acoustics Laboratory * * Mechanical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************************************ * -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
