I dont agree with that terminology, it's his not mine. DOF is relative sharpness of foreground and background objects in an image compared to the objects in the plane of focus. ( just my working terminology FWIW).
JC O'Connell [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Hunt Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > No point in hurling insults. JCO is right in respect to the ability of > a lens to resolve. Bob is correct in regard to viewing a print that's > hanging on a wall. What criterion do you use to define "the ability of a lens to resolve"? Where does that criterion come from? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
