Sure, go ahead. Cheers,
Dave 2009/4/7 Luiz Felipe <luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br>: > ...glad to read the two of you agreeing. Now David, may I use that photo of > yours as desktop background for a while? I tried to laugh quietly but my > co-workers perceived the tears in my eyes and I had to show them the thread. > > They also would like to use the photo as background for a while... > > LF > > David Savage escreveu: >> >> This is true. >> >> 2009/4/7 JC OConnell <hifis...@gate.net>: >>> >>> Its important to remember, that while good technique >>> cant improve a "bad" image, bad technique CAN >>> destroy a "good" image. Technique isnt everything, but >>> it doesnt hurt to get it right. >>> >>> JC O'Connell >>> hifis...@gate.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of >>> David Savage >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:28 AM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field >>> >>> >>> 2009/4/7 frank theriault <knarftheria...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want, >>>> until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to "get it". Some >>>> people like the theory behind things, and that's fine, too. But we >>>> can't forget what the underlying theory is about: going out and >>>> taking photos! >>> >>> Amen! >>> >>> All also add that there thousands upon thousand of technically >>> competent, but mind numbingly boring, photos on the inter web. >>> >>> I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but >>> mediocre, pool myself. >>> >>> DS -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
