> >>> I really don't think you can equate occasional > picture-talking at arbitrary > >>> locations with systematic filming of large areas. Those > acts are really very > >>> different in nature. > >> > >> How so? > >> > > I think what you're asking there is, how is knowing one > thing different > > from knowing everything? > > Moreover, the one thing is not already admissible as evidence; the > everything is *intended* as evidence. >
What do you mean? Any photograph can be used as evidence if necessary. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
