On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:53:46PM -0400, John Francis scripsit: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:10:31PM -0400, Graydon wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 07:59:05PM +0200, Thibouille scripsit: > > > Unknown, K20D, K200D, K-M/K2000 > > > > > > The center one is a lot too smaller for a 645D, 645D has less modes > > > on the knob and K200D has lots of them (all the macro blabla auto > > > programs). > > > > OK, yes, K200D. Thank you. > > > > Got fooled by the apparent relative size, there. > > > > That's a left-to-right model progression, then. > > > > -- Graydon > > K2D, anybody? The temptation of 2/20/200/2000 might be irresistable.
K200D is pretty much discontinued, though, and the 2000 is the K-m everywhere but the US, and the K20D is probably the new "midrange" model; there isn't all that much feature-and-performance space in there to support two models. I'm expecting that the eventual announced name will be in Pentax marketing's finest traditions of bewildering inexplicability. -- Graydon, who really wishes he could convince himself that big boxy viewfinder isn't some sort of high-end EVF horror. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
