On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:

> With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
> it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
> of focus was 5cm wide, I'd see the image as sharp over between 20cm and
> 50cm (depending on distance) of space in front of and behind that plane.
> Drove me dotty.

That's because with the stock matte screen not being ultimately sharp,
and view being a relatively small portion of your field of view, the
effective circle of confusion is so huge, the view through the
viewfinder has a much greater depth of field than the sensor does. 

Also note how much smaller your retina is than the sensor, and
everyone knows that a smaller sensor/film frame gives you more depth
of field.

   lrc

P.S.  Before the shitstorm blows up in my face, the above couple of
paragraphts was a psudoscientific *JOKE*. We don't want anybody on
this list blowing a gasket.



-- 
The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post
the wrong answer.
Larry Colen             [email protected]            http://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to