No, t would waste a lot more materials on a manufacturing point of
view and as a consequence, pice would sky rocket.

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Joseph McAllister <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, it would make more sense and waste less raw materials if the sensor was
> a 36mm circular one. No longer any worries about tilted horizons. Image
> formatting would be done entirely post, choosing whatever orientation you
> wanted. Never did understand why we have to use round lenses  to create
> rectangular images, after all.
>
> Leftover pixels from rounding off the square sensor could be carried over to
> the next sensor, or used in point and shoot models.
>
> <vbg>
>
> On Apr 26, 2009, at 07:16 , Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Sandy Harris wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dario Bonazza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option.
>>>>
>>>> The "square sensor" idea was ridiculous fantasy from the very beginning.
>>>
>>> It makes sense in terms of getting the most out of your lenses.
>>> For any given criterion of what acceptable performance at the
>>> edges, and any lens, you'll get a circular area in which the
>>> lens is capable of that performance. A square sensor is
>>> more efficient than any other rectangle at using that.
>>>>
>>>> From that point of view, it is an obvious optimisation.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, it may not be marketable, it would
>>> need a different mirror/viewfinder assembly, and I have
>>> no idea how it would affect sensor manufacturing cost.
>>
>> Yes, it would need a different mirror/viewfinder assembly. It would
>> increase sensor cost significantly, for sensor area that wouldn't even be
>> used most of the time (except when shooting in square format -- a rarity for
>> most of us). A large cost increase for small benefit isn't even remotely
>> practical or marketable. That's *why* it was always a ridiculous fantasy.
>
> Joseph McAllister
> [email protected]
>
> http://gallery.me.com/jomac
> http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to