Hi Tom, How did you arrive at this conclusion? What's the math behind it? Might be worthwhile to know.
Tom Rittenhouse wrote: > > My calculator says a 9x9 negative requires a 12.8cm diameter coverage. I > don't believe a their comdenser head 23C can cover that. A 6x9 image requirs > 10.8, so to cover 9x9 the light source needs to be almost an inch bigger > than to cover 6x9. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
