It's only false identification if you make a copy of an official ID. If
you use this it's fantasy identification and that's not technically
against the law. If some officious busybody happens to believe it
you're using their own mindset against them. I used to have an
"Official Press Pass." I had the blank forms, supplied my own
photograph, typed the information into the proper places, had it
laminated at my own expense. It got me into a lot of places that would
have been restricted. It was only slightly more official than one of
these...
Nick Wright wrote:
So now they can add "creating false identification" to the list of
charges they bring against photographers?
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
links snagged from Bruce Schneier's blog
http://www.matthewwilliamsdesign.com/weblog/index.php/site/comments/muni_dont_take_my_kodachrome/
http://www.matthewwilliamsdesign.com/misc/PHOTOLICENSE_DHS.eps
http://www.matthewwilliamsdesign.com/misc/PHOTOLICENSE_MUNI.eps
--
The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post
the wrong answer.
Larry Colen [email protected] http://www.red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
