On Jul 9, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
XP is fundamentally identical to Win2K. It was in many ways a reskinned version of Win2K with better DirectX support for gaming. It did evolve some differences with SP2 and later though.
Is can be true or not, I have not much experiece with Win2K as I have with XP. I'm just saying that the way Microsoft went with XP, Vista and 7 userlandwise wrong. Instead of maintaining the old Win2K and NT look and one other look they should have developed one look wich can suite everyone, or is so subtle that no one really cares to change it.
Of course there also technical reasons I don't like Windows, the registry for example. I always dreamed that tomorrow the files in which it is store get broke or got somehow corrupted. Because one software didn't really know how to change it. I guess most of the time the registry works but I don't feel good about it.
Thomas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
