It was hardly a threat to their film bushiness when it was first built. God only knows what a production camera would have cost, and the sensor technology was still in it's infancy. They built it looked at the costs of production compared the quality of output to what film could produce and decided not to invest further at that time, because the couldn't conceive of anyone paying the cost for an inferior product. Remember it's not just the camera, but the output devices that make digital photography possible. In 1977 a "high resolution" color monitor would have set you back thousands of dollars, digital color printers didn't exist as such, personal computers were things like the TRS 80, Apple }{ not really hight resolution display computers, there was no home market and building one would have required developing everything from printers to computers to cameras, pretty much from scratch.
Rick Womer wrote:
Yup.  Invented, patented, and then buried as a threat to their cash-cow film 
and processing business.

They rather blew it, didn't they?

Rick

http://photo.net/photos/RickW


--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Igor Roshchin <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Igor Roshchin <[email protected]>
Subject: First digital camera
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 5:53 PM


Some people may have know about this, but it was a surprise
to me.

Interesting patent(s) circa 1977:
http://www.google.com/patents?vid=4131919

- the first digital camera:
http://mindhobby.com/images/7/first/1.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Sasson


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above and follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--


The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or 
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn 
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a 
free man any more than a dog.

        --G. K. Chesterton


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to