You've discovered one of the 'endearing' philosophies of Adobe and its
products. Rather than adjust their internal settings to match the
outside world, they seek to adjust the outside world to align with
their internal realities.
IOW, by your obsevations you would need to edit pictures specifically
for your setup, which would render them unusable in other
applications.
regards, Anthony
"Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
(Anon)
2009/7/19 Igor Roshchin <[email protected]>:
>
> I was trying to figure out this strange problem with printing from
> LR and PS to Epson R2880 by using paper profiles.
>
> I think my problem is solved, but I discovered a weird feature of the
> profiles and Epson software.
>
> Here is what I was seeing:
> Settings 1. Enabled color management by printer ("Standard RGB"),
> disabled by the software
> -> reasonable colors.
>
> Settings 2. Disabled color management by printer ("Custom -> Off")
> enabled paper (printer) .icc profile
> -> shift towards green and red.
>
> Now, I also saw that the preview generated by the printer software
> (if I check-mark in the printer settings the corresponding box)
> was producing the same color shift.
>
> Conclusion:
> Settings 2: it works, BUT: the preview is still way off.
> I am not sure why, but it's a feature.
>
> More over, in PS, when I choose a profile for color proof, -
> the image also shows that same ugly color shift.
>
> I am puzzled why these color-proofing methods do not produce the
> expected results, rendering useless (and even worse: misleading).
> I should point out that the colors I see on the display in both PS
> and LR are very close to the outcome I get from the printer by
> printing with the .icc profiles.
>
> Igor
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
