The works were distributed in violation of copyright. It wasn't just a
case of someone changing their mind. Amazon had to pull the plug on
them.
Paul
On Jul 19, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Graydon wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:20:26AM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit:
So this particular Amazon contributor had apparently scanned the book
themselves. As such is an illegitimate digtialisation, and they are
breaking copyright. No wonder Amazon would call the purchases back. I
empathise with those who had their books deleted from their readers,
though.
No.
The publisher *changed their mind* about selling an electronic edition
and retroactively deleted the copies that had been sold.
Think about this in context of news or political writing.
-- Graydon
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
