Dave, Of the IR stuff, I like #2, #3, and #4. #1 is a bit of a cliche shot - not enough of an attention grabber. The composition on #2 and #3 make them unusual. And the horses in #4 are beautiful.
Of the B&W, I like #3 for the composition. #2 may be OK, but the high branches get messy. Regards, Bob S. On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:59 AM, David J Brooks<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm starting to make my cuts for this years contest and i could use > some help in deciding on two categories. > > Special Effect.(B&W category) > > I usually enter an IR shot, and this year is no exception. I have > these in mind, links more or less in order of what i think, what say > you all.: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/3728482401/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/3723267887/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/3639973164/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/2822238794/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/2631795250 > > (I may think about using the IR tree and barn as a Tree submission as well.) > > > Trees.(B&W category) > > Its pretty hard to come up with something out of the norm, which is > what they look for, but i have narrowed down to these. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9047292 > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9146994 > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9282123 > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8514555 > > > > Thanks for any and all input > > Dave > > -- > Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > York Region, Ontario, Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
