Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain "je ne se qua" that not one can measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared to the DA35, it's an expensive bit of français.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graydon Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:44 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: DA 35 v. FA 31 On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:59:34AM -0400, Miserere scripsit: > 2009/7/27 Graydon <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit: > > > > The FA31 is faster, larger, is practical for ambient light indoor > > photography, and has a very particular rendering **I despair to describe.** > > Graydon, > > On behalf on the League of Photographers with Stereoscopic Vision in > Defence of 2D Images, I thank you for despairing instead of falling > into the all-too-common trap of describing the photos from the 31 Ltd > as "3D". You're most welcome! It's by no means 3D. Languishing for wildly romantic scenes in the dim light of evening, quite possibly. Wishes it were in elfland in the morning? Arguable. But 3D it is not. -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
