Might try for a third version. Combine your less processed foreground
with the more processed storm clouds.
I would tone down the clouds slightly.
From: "Desjardins, Steve"
I feel your pain. ;-P Her version is overprocessed, but I think most
folks (not from the PDML) would prefer the vivid look of her version.
The use of PS has shifted tastes in that direction.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry
Colen
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:30 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc: Jeff Zimmerman; John Blevins
Subject: The difference in Post Processing
My friend Candice saw the night lightning shots I got about a month
ago and told me to give her a copy of the raw files.
Here's the difference between my quick and dirty in lightroom, and
someone who knows what she's doing in photoshop:
flickr gallery
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157621826796513/
Mine:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2670/3790961517_792f82b65f_b.jpg
Hers:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2562/3790960979_00061ffd0b_b.jpg
Yup, about a week late for the night photography PUG.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
