Actually some one on this list might have an 80-320 for sale. I'm sure they wil see this post.
Dave On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM, David J Brooks<[email protected]> wrote: > What about the 55-300 Pentax. Seems like a good one. > > Dave > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Tony Cogan<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I'm new here, although I did receive this back a few years ago. I have a >> question. >> >> I have used the Pentax FA 80-320 for a few years. I loaned it out and the >> borrower dropped it, rendering it useless. >> >> Now I need to replace it - for less money than I would prefer to spend. How >> do you people think it compares with the Sigma 70-300 f4-5.6? Is there a >> different lens to consider in the under-$250 price range? >> >> Many thanks, >> Tony >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > York Region, Ontario, Canada > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
