On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell<[email protected]> wrote: > That's sorta my point, > A FF Pentax DSLR is not going to be that much bigger > than the current APS DSLR because APS is already using > the same size lens mount, registration etc > and those will not increase in size with a FF Pentax DSLR.
While mount and register remain the same, the mirror box is significantly smaller which allows smaller bodies in practice from APS-C. As a practical matter the smallest FF DSLR (the Canon 5D) is the same size as the largest APS-C DSLR (the Nikon D300s) but overall APS-C DSLR's are generally much smaller than any FF SLR. Depth is pretty similar across the various lines (depending on grip configuration) but smaller prisms and the ability to put circuitry and batteries into places that would extend into the mirror box on FF allow more compact designs. > > 4/3 DSLRs are smaller than APS DSLRs are they not? > Arent the lens mounts smaller, and the registrations > shorter too? Lens mount is smaller, registration is a bit shorter at ~38mm, cameras are generally on the large side for their class (the E-3, E-30 and E-520 are all larger than their competition aside from the outlier than is the D300). The smallest available body is the Olympus E-450, but the smallest available body/lens combination is the Pentax K-m with DA Limited 40/2.8. > > > -- > J.C. O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) > Home Page - www.jchriso.com > Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
