Some refinements in my thoughts below:
J.C. O'Connell wrote:
FF should not only be able to achieve higher system resolution
at same or larger sensor resolutions, it should also be able
to achieve same low noise performance at higher ISO sensitivities
than APS sensor due to larger area sensor pixels. Just like APS
images better than tiny digital p&s sensors when done right, D-FF
should image better than D-APS when done right.
1) At its highest, D-FF should image better than D-APS at its highest,
especially in poor light and harsh conditions.
2) D-APS already outperforms the highest needs of say 99% the DSLR users.
This makes No.1 irrelevant to 99% of DSLR users.
3) An ever-increasing number of DSLR users want FF. When they will be the
majority, it will make No.2 irrelevant to 99% of DSLR users, thus
resurrecting No.1.
Sweet surrender, I guess.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
