Wow, Daniel- I love that shot.
--Sasha On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Daniel J. Matyola<[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Bob. It is one of my favorite travel images, which is why I > was bummed out when Pentax rejected it after holding it under review > for so long. > > Dan > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Bob Sullivan<[email protected]> wrote: >> Dan, >> Trite or not, it's still a magnificent image. >> Regards, Bob S. >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Daniel J. Matyola<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Thanks for your kind remarks, Jack and Paul. >>> >>> Although this is one of my favorite images, I think it may have been >>> viewed as trite. When I took the image, I had never seen photos of >>> Peyto Lake, and I was stunned by its beauty. Since then, I have seen >>> a number of shots taken from this precise vantage point, and they all >>> look pretty much the same. I think that the image may have gotten >>> enough votes, but that the Pentax reviewers might have said "Ho-hum, >>> not this again." >>> >>> Thanks for looking. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Jack Davis<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Magnificent shot. Was possibly held for further review which could very >>>> well be a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a >>>> grade. >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: PPG quota >>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:39 PM >>>>> I had another of those frustrating >>>>> experiences with the PPG. >>>>> >>>>> Almost a month ago, I submitted several old scanned images, >>>>> including this one: >>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9522634 >>>>> >>>>> All the others were rejected. in about 2 weeks. >>>>> I submitted several >>>>> more, and they were rejected, but this one remained "ready >>>>> for >>>>> review." Today, finally, it showed up in the >>>>> "Declined" section. >>>>> Somehow, it doesn't bother me when images are rejected >>>>> promptly, but >>>>> when one is held for almost a month, I get my hopes up, and >>>>> get >>>>> disappointed when it is finally rejected after an extended >>>>> "review." >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >>>>> directly above and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
