It's not the HTML per se that's the problem. They actually resize to a
smaller dimension than the page will display and use the HTML to upres
the picture. Nothing will give optimal results when you do that, though
some applications are better than others. Browsers are very bad a it.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Graydon <[email protected]> wrote:
Blogspot (as I've experienced it, anyway) flatly will not allow images
larger than 1600 pixels in width, and resizes anything uploaded to
conform to this.
This doesn't seem to be the problem, since the large picture you get to
see by clicking on the smaller picture on the blog page is displayed
correctly. The trouble is only with the pictures embedded in the page.
These are scaled by Blogger from the larger picture uploaded by the
blogger.
Could someone please have a look at the page's code if there's anything
odd? I'm not that good with HTML.
Ralf
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
