As far as kit lenses, go the Pentax 18-55 is as good as it gets, so between that and the Sigma, I'd stick with the Pentax.
Yeah, I used to have an FA 28-90. It was not bad, but it was not something to rave about either. I later traded it for an FA 28-105 then an FA 24-90. On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Dennis Gibson <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone used both the Sigma and the Pentax 18-55mm? I shot a bunch of > interiors with the Pentax awhile back and didn't look at them until now. I > shouldn't be surprised at the barrel distortion at 18mm but it's worse than > I expected. Previously almost everything was shot outdoors where it's not as > noticeable. I know; kit lenses aren't anything worth writing home about. I > wonder if the Sigma is any better. I have an opportunity to get one at a > very reasonable price. > > Anyone here using the Pentax-FA 28-90mm? I'm quite underwhelmed with mine > but fortunately paid very little for it. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
