> A meter that is metering flare is working like it should do. If the meter > sees it, it meters it. If anything is at fault it the lens it meters > through. Same for non-visible wave-lengths. > Memory and non-linearity is feature of meters not longer in production. > Meters are so good nowadays that if you don't get the desired exposure its > your fault not the meters.
That's tautological (however it works is how it should work), but, whatever. I think you're making some good points in a contentious and perhaps not very clear manner.... The fact is that _technically_, making a "perfect" meter is almost impossible. A few discussions with designers of meters would make that obvious. However, you're right that almost all of today's meters are good enough. --Mike - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
