ah here we are...
Igor, I took this one into photoshop and cranked up saturation and
lowered brightness... I would
call it an improvement, but, alas - in doing that I unveiled some
sensor gunk....
(could be on the lens I Guess, but sure looks like the sensor problem I
had back a few months ago.)
The intensity of lighting, of course, is subject to the variences in our
respective monitors...
You can see it in your original, but it became more obvious when I
darkened the sky..
look at the windmill that is almost center, right above it... soft dark
circle... more at the top, too.
sorry...
ann
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Oops...
The second shot is:
http://komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2008/IMGP3963.jpg
Igor
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:59:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Roshchin
To: [email protected]
Subject: What to do with these images?
I found a few shots I took in 2008 in Central California
(just north of Los Angeles).
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2008/IMGP3960.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2008/IMGP3960.jpg
To me they appear incomplete.
For one, I wish I had a polarizer for the sky.
I tried to tweak them a bit today, but I couldn't come up with what can
be done to make them "playing".
Your suggestions are solicited.
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
