NO . NOT WITH PHOTOGRAPHY. Tom :-)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:57 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2009-11-13 12:17 , J.C. O'Connell wrote: >> >> You wouldn't say perfect or highest possible fideility is overrated >> if you heard some of the worlds greatest recordings >> in all their glory. > > please don't tell me what _i'd_ say > > i've spent a lifetime enjoying a wide variety of great live music; while i > understand fidelity and the limitations of digital (and analog) audio, and > while i'm somewhat awed by top-notch equipment and its output, i have no > problem with "good enough" for recorded music; good enough is a holistic > evaluation that everone will make differently -- for me it's more about the > expression and "heart" of the music than it is about absolute fidelity; even > with mediocre equipment and lots of background noise i can really enjoy > music; i think that sense of "good enough" holds for a lot of others too, > based on the prevalence of car audio, iPods, etc. > > it's pretty much same with photography for me > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
