yes, I have recall too. The original contention was in error, $1K doesn't get you to the plateau of turntable performance as suggested. Its just another step of the hill...
-- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) Join the CD PLAYER & DISC Discussions : http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Studdert Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 5:57 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, , exposedinvideo On 15/11/2009, J.C. O'Connell <[email protected]> wrote: > ownership has nothing to do with this. I don't own a $100K turntable, > but that doesn't mean they don't exist or my or your turntables are > just as good as the $100K turntables. You can have opinions based on > experinences and auditions, ownerships isnt a requirement. In this > case Im just arguing your opinion that your $1K turntable is as good > as the the $10k and $100K models or that at $1000 you are record > quality limited, is wrong. That level ( fully record limited) of > playback performance is not possible for only $1K. It costs much more > than that to get the job done as well as possible. Do you ever actually read what anyone else writes John? Serious question. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
