frank theriault wrote: >On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> This one is, as I say, odd. I found it while going through some old >> stuff. It's a B&W (film) shot from several years ago: Pentax MX, >> A50/1.4 and Ilford Delta 400. >> >> This shot was seriously underexposed, yielding a very thin negative >> and a very grainy print. But I still kind of liked the shot. So, >> rather than trying to hide the grain, I tried to *emphasize* it as >> much as possible. I think I like the result... >> >> http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7cf00405.htm > >It's got an almost menacing feel to it.
And it makes Tom Cakalic want to go there. Makes you worry about him, doesn't it? ;-) >Terrific photo. Thanks (and to everyone else who commented). This is one of those shots that you can't quite judge yourself. That the on-line version looks OK is reassuring because you can't see the grain properly in the downsampled web version: The full-rez one looks *much* better and I think it'll make a great print. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
