60-250 had been announced and, indeed, much postponed.
Probably why Pentax doesn't announce lenses anymore. You can't be late
when nothing is supposed to come...

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:30 PM, eckinator <[email protected]> wrote:
> well given the time to market of the 60-250 we can all hang back and
> not sell our current dfa100s until 2012, is it? hurry up pentax, I
> want that thing...
>
> 2009/12/1 Thibouille <[email protected]>:
>> It seems to be true, not a PSed one.
>>
>> Benefits:
>> * construction (Limited finish it seems)
>> * WRed.
>> * still a DFA of course so 'FF'.
>>
>> It makes much sense to WR a macro IMO.
>> Lots of people using that kind of lenses outside will be happy and it
>> is a good selling point against third party alternatives.
>> Also, the current DFA's construction is not quite the best one could
>> wish for. Maybe this is better (it looks like it is better but is it
>> plastic or metal? Not sure).
>>
>> --
>> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
>> ----------------------
>> Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
>> DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
>> Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
>> Programing: Delphi 2009
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
----------------------
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
Programing: Delphi 2009

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to