A waterproof DA 100/2.8 Macro would be welcome, but I've never had problems using an A100/2.8 Macro. If waterproofing is the only new additional feature, it's not enough of a reason to upgrade. Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Thibouille <[email protected]> wrote: > The ongoing thought, both on DPR and Pentaxforums, is that the pic > isn't a picture of the said lens but a CAD rendering of it. > It seems there's been a confirmation that the said lens is indeed > coming but as usual this is not an official confirmation so > basically... it hints at the fact it may be true. It certainly doesn't > mean it is true. > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> eckinator wrote: >> >>>well given the time to market of the 60-250 we can all hang back and >>>not sell our current dfa100s until 2012, is it? hurry up pentax, I >>>want that thing... >> >> Unfortunately, the image shown is a Photoshop-job made from a 31 Ltd >> and one or two other lenses. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs > ---------------------- > Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, > DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... > Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 > Programing: Delphi 2009 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
