On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Scott Loveless <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/18/09, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: "P. J. Alling" >> >> > I'd have to submit something to Pentax to get a few rejects. I don't >> think I could stand the aggravation. >> > >> >> It was discussed as a possible theme earlier and I understood the consensus >> was it didn't have to be actually submitted and rejected. >> >> It qualified if someone at sometime had rejected it for the Pentax Gallery >> ... even if you only rejected it yourself. > > My opinion, not that it counts, is if you have a photo that was > rejected by the PPG, then you should submit it. If you don't have a > PPG reject, but have a photo that was rejected elsewhere (another on > line gallery, an exhibit, magazine submission, etc.) that would OK, > too. Photos of Cotty are also acceptable.
Oh goody.;-) Dave > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
