On Dec 24, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 25/12/2009, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've come to prefer the K7 body, and while I like what I am seeing in the >> K-x, I have no wish to go back to a 10mp camera. If they could get a 15mp >> chip from Sony with K-x performance, that would be nice. > > Honestly there's very little in it resolution wise, 14.6MP for the > K20/7 or 12.4MP for the Kx, just set ACR to convert +1, the Kx files > come out at 5120 x 3401 pixels. > I agree. That's not a big difference. But the big plus for me with the K7 has been the exposure accuracy. No comparison between that camera and the 20 in regards to nailing the exposure. The Kx doesn't have the same metering system as the K20. It's considerably less sophisticated in that regard. That would be the deal breaker for me. Plus, I think it's even smaller. The K7 is borderline in that regard for me, even with the battery grip installed. I need mass for handholding. As far as low light is concerned, I've found the K7 to be quite adequate at 3200 with accurate exposure, and that's all I need. My commercial work is never low light. I do shoot lowlight snaps of Grace and pics for grins, but those aren't critical. Paul > -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
