William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Margus Männik"
Subject: Re: dpreview reviews the k-x....
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Tim Bray wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Subash <[email protected]> wrote:
...and gives it a 'highly recommended':
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxkx/
And says the low-light handling is better than the K-7's. Hmf. -T
And a lot better! For that reason, some time ago I wrote I'd love a
K-7 with the K-x sensor.
Dario
... and K20D body, please!
I've come to prefer the K7 body, and while I like what I am seeing in
the K-x, I have no wish to go back to a 10mp camera. If they could get
a 15mp chip from Sony with K-x performance, that would be nice.
I don't like small-sized bodies. Nikon D3x was quite perfect for me. OK,
if it can't be K20D body, then let it be at least the digital version of
Z-1p. K-7 is a bit too short from left.
Megapixels... as long as there's enough pixels to fill A4 (8"x12") at
300dpi, I'm happy. It's APS-C body and there's no reason to increase the
sensor density without end. If I really do need more, I still have my
film bodies and possibility to use Imacon scanner. No digital camera can
beat 'em :) If even that's not enough, I have also some 6x6 cameras.
But that's just my point of view.
BR, Margus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
