Bill, wasn't "cheap plastic toycam" pretty much what you called the
*ist-D. I think I see a K-x in your future...
On 12/31/2009 10:46 AM, William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Margus Männik"
Subject: Re: K-x and high-ISO performance???
Why... to get to know, that K-7 successor will be worth of buying.
There is technical progress going on, you know. Besides, our K20Ds
didn't got any worse with appearance f K-7 and K-x... Pentax K-x has
it's good sides, but in other areas it's still not comparable with K-7.
The K-x has better high ISO performance in a cheap plastic toycam.
This is the only parameter where it is better than the K7.
William Robb
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
