On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:46 AM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Margus Männik" > Subject: Re: K-x and high-ISO performance??? > > >> Why... to get to know, that K-7 successor will be worth of buying. There >> is technical progress going on, you know. Besides, our K20Ds didn't got any >> worse with appearance f K-7 and K-x... Pentax K-x has it's good sides, but >> in other areas it's still not comparable with K-7. > > The K-x has better high ISO performance in a cheap plastic toycam. > This is the only parameter where it is better than the K7.
Does the K-7 use better cheap plastic.??:-) Dave > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
