I had a chance to test K-x over the weekend using high-ISO in low-light setting. As I wrote in another thread, it was very underwhelming with 16-50/2.8, but that was a problem of the lens (in my very subjective opinion).
It did great with 50-135/2.8: ISO-3200: http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP4428.html http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0114.html ISO-1600: http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0292.html http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0310.html http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0323.html It's a hard decision... I like K-7's feel and AF-performance and other features better, but as many pointed out, K-x's matrix is _MUCH_ better at high ISO. Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
