On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Paul, I agree that it is possible to do good pictures with K-7 at
1600.
- I posted one just recently
http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2010-January/205671.html
My point is rather that with K-x one can push further; and it is also
more consistent.
Interesting. But you say below that you had to push the exposure in
three shots. I find the metering in the K7 to be extremely accurate,
and I rarely have to push a shot in conversion. Consistency is one of
that camera's main virtues.
Paul
I suspect that at high ISO-s K-7's latitude become very shallow, and
hence slightly larger dynamic range of the scene or slight error in
the exposure (underexposure) make the photo unusable.
All three of the ISO-1600 that I listed, were pushed by +0.3- +0.6
up in exposure (in LR).
This one:
http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0172.html
was pushed to +1.
Tue Jan 19 06:13:08 CST 2010
Christine Aguila wrote:
Wow, that is impressive, but everything does great with the DA*
50-135mm
:-). Cheers, Christine
Is it like ketchup? ;-)
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
