Assuming one has modern substitutes, but those substitutes aren't
available everywhere.
On 2/6/2010 9:39 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Feb 6, 2010, at 9:26 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:48 PM, P N Stenquist<[email protected]> wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10637125&size=lg
K7D, DA* 50-135/2.8, f7.1, 1/3200th, ISO 400, 65mm
My hero!
Thought you might like that:-). But it's hard to imagine how anyone could be in
favor of harvesting animal fur -- regardless of how one might feel about eating
meat or other related issues. Fur is not a necessity by any stretch of the
imagination.
Paul
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
