what IS up here... I'm not Mike, either. I think that Virus might have gotten you a little mixed up.
Cory ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: Re: P67 info > Hi Mike, > > Ctein has, indeed, published some test results of 67 lenses. At least > some were published in Ed Buziak's magazine - Camera & Darkroom. Here's > one review: > > http://www.camera-and-darkroom.co.uk/issue40.html > > and you can search the site to see if there are others. > > Ed sent me that issue, and I may - doubtful, but possible - still have > it. > > Mike Johnston wrote: > > > > > So, for all of you 67 owners out there, perhaps you can answer a > > > question for me. I am very familiar with the 35mm lenses, and their > > > features - M42, K, M, A, F, FA. I would like to know more about the > > > 67 lenses and backward compatibility - I would be considering the 67II > > > - - is there any issues or concerns with old vs. new glass? > > > > This doesn't really speak to your question, Bruce, but my friend Ctein, who > > has been writing for U.S. photography magazines for nearly 30 years, has > > always photographed with a Pentax 6x7. He did a number of direct tests of > > old and new lenses, and discovered that some of the newer designs are far > > superior. I don't know if he's published his results or not, but if you'd > > like me to ask him to comment on specifics for the benefit of the list, I'd > > be happy to. > > > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
