On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:42 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Roshchin" > Subject: Re: OT: The death of the photolab > > > >> I don't how it is now, - haven't used Walmart labs for long time. >> It was interesting to read, Bill, and thanks for "heads-up" - >> now I know that I should be careful with the next Walmart when >> I'd neet to use it. > > It might be different down there. Wal-Mart USA, when I was with the company, > was affiliated with Fuji, while Wal-Mart Canada is Kodak. > Having said this, I think the trend is towards dry labs, since they require > even less of the "technicians" than wet labs. > I don't think it matters to them that the wet labs are better. > > William Robb > >
A dry lab run by idiots is far superior to a wet lab run by idiots. It's a lot harder to screw up and the screwups are more immediately obvious. A dry lab run by experts is inferior to a wet lab run by experts. What sort of employees do you think they expect to have? -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
