From: Adam Maas
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:42 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Roshchin"
> Subject: Re: OT: The death of the photolab
>
>
>
>> I don't how it is now, - haven't used Walmart labs for long time.
>> It was interesting to read, Bill, and thanks for "heads-up" -
>> now I know that I should be careful with the next Walmart when
>> I'd neet to use it.
>
> It might be different down there. Wal-Mart USA, when I was with the company,
> was affiliated with Fuji, while Wal-Mart Canada is Kodak.
> Having said this, I think the trend is towards dry labs, since they require
> even less of the "technicians" than wet labs.
> I don't think it matters to them that the wet labs are better.
>
> William Robb
>
>
A dry lab run by idiots is far superior to a wet lab run by idiots.
It's a lot harder to screw up and the screwups are more immediately obvious.
A dry lab run by experts is inferior to a wet lab run by experts.
What sort of employees do you think they expect to have?
Based on personal experience, they'll be lucky to find one person who
cares enough to become an expert. But they won't value that person if or
when they find him.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
