P N Stenquist wrote:
I see what you mean. Great subject and good composition....but. The
clone tool is your friend:-).
Paul
What Paul said and if you use it take the "tree' out of his head...
I like the harsh lighting... because key elements are brightly
lit but not blown out...
Not quite up to your usual terrificness tho
ann
On Mar 7, 2010, at 9:40 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I'm struggling with this one. Took about 1/2 dozen of this young man
(the cigarette rather interested me), but the background was horrible
- not just passing pedestrians, but all sorts of junk kept getting in
the way, not matter what angle I shot from. Harsh light wasn't my
friend either. Even this shot (the least cluttered of the bunch) was
cropped severely to "clean things up" - at least a bit.
Does it work? I'd prefer more environment in the shot, but given
that's not possible what are your thoughts on this one:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/03/cellist-on-augusta.html
I fear it may be one for the trashcan - an "almost but not quite".
Hope you enjoy. Comments encouraged.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
