Darkrooms take up a lot of space, scanners not so much. (I miss b&W
printing, I'm not sure I'm still good at it though).
On 3/10/2010 9:24 AM, David Savage wrote:
I like shooting film (B&W, in the LX with the FA 31mm f1.8), I even
like developing it.
It's the scanning of film that I hate with a fundamentalist passion.
On 10 March 2010 11:11, Tom C<[email protected]> wrote:
Over the past several years I've scanned and reviewed earlier scanned
images I've made. There is something about them that's undefinable
and draws me to them over my digitally captured images.
I can't say what it is. Possibly a sense of being closer to reality,
in the same vein that I recognize an analog record as sounding better
than a CD? Possibly the smoothness of film across the dynamic range?
I don't know.
Unless I were able to take side-by-side film vs. digitally captured
images in the same format, using the same lens, it would be difficult
to make an objective comparison.
So subjectively, as far as image quality is concerned, I'm tending to
lean towards film... though it's obviously a dead end.
I hope to scan quite a number of film images captured from the past
ten years and subjectively, of course, compare them to my overall
sense of digitally captured images.
Partially responsible for making me think along these lines, is a
recent advert from Alien Skin Exposure 2, a film simulator plug-in.
http://tinyurl.com/yz2zybg
Does anyone have any experience with it?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
