Oops, should have been very little correlation. On Monday 21 January 2002 20:33, you wrote: > > Having grown up in the cattle business, I remember the words of a > > wise old cattleman who said, "There is a very correlation between > > price and value in purebred cattle." That seems to hold true in > > used Pentax equipment as well. ;-) > > Are we missing an adjective in there? Very good correlation? Very > poor correlation--? > > --Mike -- Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #24980801 Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Bob Blakely
- Re: Authority (was Re: I still want the A* 13... Bob Blakely
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Peter Alling
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Bob Blakely
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Peter Alling
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Rob Studdert
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Ken Archer
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Antti-Pekka Virjonen
- RE: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Peifer, William [OCDUS]
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Ken Archer
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Rob Studdert
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Rfsindg
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Paul Stenquist
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Paul Stenquist
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: I still want the A* 135/1.8 Paul Stenquist

