On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/19/2010 10:32 AM, Adam Maas wrote: >> >> I've owned the A and M(1st version) 28/2.8's and now use a Tamron >> 28/2.5 Adaptall-2. The A was decent, the M poor, the Tamron is >> superior to either. >> > > Interesting. I have an adaptall 28 at home. > How does it compare with the vivitar series 1 28-105 at 28? >
Wouldn't know for sure, but a solid bet is the prime is better due to lower distortion (zooms typically have more distortion at each end than a prime will have) and probably sharper at wide apertures. -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
