Aperture and shutter are part of the same mechanism in the camera body.
I expect a good machinist could make an adapter that had an aperture
built in, but then it might change the register distance too much.
On 3/22/2010 7:25 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Those are very nice. How fun to be able to use these lenses again.
I'm not very knowledgeable about the Pentax 110. Why only f2.8? No
aperture ring or no mechanical coupling?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi<[email protected]> wrote:
Thought some folks would get a kick out of this ...
http://www.flickr.com/groups/1084...@n23/discuss/72157623543813407/
Godfrey
--
a photo blog: http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
