They have been resized without being resized, if you see what I mean. Click on them to get the full, web-resolution picture. ---- Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve, > No aperture ring or blades inside. > F2.8 was as big as they made them. > Why are the pictures on the site so distorted. > They look squashed or elongated... :-( > Regards, Bob S. > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Those are very nice. How fun to be able to use these lenses again. > > I'm not very knowledgeable about the Pentax 110. Why only f2.8? No > > aperture ring or no mechanical coupling? > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thought some folks would get a kick out of this ... > >> > >> http://www.flickr.com/groups/1084...@n23/discuss/72157623543813407/ > >> > >> Godfrey > >> -- > >> a photo blog: http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >> follow the directions. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Steve Desjardins > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
