for all we know that "beater" is going to be used as parts for one he already has in "MINT" shape
--- "Paris, Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe not, but if the body works, that lens will > give him quality results, > whether the body is a beater or not. It has to do > with spending your money > where it will do the most good. > > Len > --- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Didn't someone want a 135/1.8? > > > I don't know but $600 US seems a bit high to be > sending a seller with 0 > feedback. > > Ok, I'll admit it, I have too much time on my hands. > Did anyone else check > out the > current high bidders previous purchases. Defiantly > a Pentax fan. His > previous camera > body purchase was a 'Beater' LX for $165. Now he's > buying arguably the > most expensive > 135mm lens he could buy for this camera. I'm not > sure if this is a > brilliant strategy, > or what? > - ______________________________________________________________________ Web-hosting solutions for home and business! http://website.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
