On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > John Francis wrote: > >> I seriously expect any mid-life kicker for the K-7 (let's call it the K-7x, >> although I think K-7n is a rather more likely name) would have the features >> that you list, with at least the pixel count, frame rate, etc. of the K-7. > > Since the K-X reputedly gets a lot better results than the Sony camera > that uses the same sensor, one would assume the difference comes from > improvements the processing engine and firmware. Perhaps these > improvements could migrate into a new camera to get better results > from the K7's sensor (or an improved version of that sensor). > >> It appears that several K20 owners on the list are holding on for a while >> to see if such a camera shows up; if it does, they'll probably buy one. > > I'm one who has stayed with the K20D. I won't be upgrading until > something with a lot better resolution shows up. That probably means > full frame. > That means 645D.
Based on personal observation only, I'd say that the K7 renders more detail at ISO 200 than any 135 film I ever used. Of course, the DA* lenses have a lot to do with that. Paul > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
