Mike, Thanks for the heads-up. I actually inherited my father's V35 whch came with the Leitz 40. It has performed very well, but then I haven't compared it to anything else except the Nikkor 50/2.8. The Leitz gets the nod in that comparison. I have been using a Rodenstock 90/Omega C700XL for the 67 and I was hoping to enlarge up to 16x20 without changing my set up drastically. Is 75mm a standard lens for enlarging 645? Cheers, Bob --- Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have been thinking of trying a wide angle > enlarging > > lens for my 645 and 67 negatives. Has anyone had > any > > experience with the Schneider or Rodenstock 60mm > > enlarging lenses? > > Inquiring eyes need to know...Bob > > Bob, > Don't. Virtually all WA enlarging lenses suck, even > the 40mm Leitz. It's > really best just to dismiss them altogether and use > a lens that's standard > for the negative size and leave it at that. > > --Mike > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . >
===== What boots up must come down. Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
